CarSpyShots
Quick Member Login:
Forgot password?
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members:
Total Threads:
Total Posts:


There are users
currently browsing forums.
  FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-15-2005, 02:10 AM
Tman2 Tman2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 51
Default Where will the horsepower war end?

Do you guys find the horsepower war a little ridiculous? Lets be realistic before we blurt out "Hell No!". Back when I went to highschool, a car with 200 horsepower was considered a LOT. Nowadays, family sedans get 230-280. Yes, North Americans are getting fatter and lazier each, but how much horsepower do we need to haul our butts up a hill? Each year, the outputs and engine displacement ratchets up. Fuel economy goes up slightly as technology increases, but imagine where we could be with the worldwide oil situation if horsepower stayed the same while technology greatly improved fuel economy rather than just maintain it (or marginally increased).
What I'm saying is, would you rather have the market flooded with 3.4-4.0L V6 and +5.0L V8s (as it is now), or have super rare,niche market, narrowly-focused cars like the Lotus Elise?
Do you miss the days when the handling dynamics were pure and simple, thanks to a lightweight chassis? Or do you prefer the big torque of V6 accelerating your big, heavy chassis out of a corner.
Should Honda (for instance) make a 300 hp Accord next year or trim 300lbs and keep the same 240hp?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-15-2005, 02:21 AM
Top Secret Top Secret is offline
CSS Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,122
Default Re: Where will the horsepower war end? (Tman2)

Yes, to be honest, reducing weight, instead of increasing engine power is a more logical idea. Less weight means smaller fuel economy, less stress on the wheels, basically, all positives, while having increased engine power - sure, it's always good to just brag about how much HP this car has, and that's the publics perception; more power means a faster car and therefore you look cooler. That's what the people buy and the car companies are just happy to provide for the consumer.

And to the main question. Until someone just happens to lead everybody in the world to a universal revolt against high-powered cars, I think the horsepower war will never end - it will just continue to grow and grow.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2005, 04:04 AM
pcread pcread is offline
CSS Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,246
Default Re: Where will the horsepower war end? (Top Secret)

Similar thing happened in aviation in the States, efficient airframes lost out to more powerful engines. The addage was that you could make a barn door fly if you stuck a big enough engine on it.
Maybe because American gas prices have always been so low and the roads so straight, big blocks in heavy cars were the easiest way to progress.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-15-2005, 08:57 AM
Naga Royal Guard's Avatar
Naga Royal Guard Naga Royal Guard is offline
CSS Oldtimer
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,434
Send a message via AIM to Naga Royal Guard Send a message via MSN to Naga Royal Guard Send a message via Yahoo to Naga Royal Guard
Default

bigger engines and heavier cars are what the people need, ask them why and you will wish you never asked
__________________
Well, to be truthful the blueprint's simply rage and youthful exuberance (MM)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2005, 09:57 AM
pcread pcread is offline
CSS Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,246
Default

until the oil runs out...
then they'll scream; "Why didn't you warn us? Why did you let us demand gas-guzzling V8s in overweight cars?"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2005, 03:58 PM
Flagship's Avatar
Flagship Flagship is offline
neighborhood pervert
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: (pcread)

This will all stop when soccer moms finally realize that the size of your car doesnt make you a better person.

You dont need a Lincoln Navigator to take two kids to soccer practice!

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2005, 06:55 PM
Nick's Avatar
Nick Nick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Thousand Oaks, California
Posts: 853
Send a message via AIM to Nick
Default

personally, I want power...I mean, there are some exceptions, like as you put it, the elise, its a small car with low hp, but the fact that it doesnt weigh much gives it a lot of balls...small cars are fun and everything, like my friend has a custom porsche 914 which is a blast to drive, but i would like to have power in more than just small cars...I feel better in cars with more substance, that being said I also likethe feel of high displacement engines more than anything else, nothing feels better than hearing and feeling the roar of a big block as you step into the gas and the car launches forward and puched you back in your seat...I like power..and lets say for example I drive a large family sedan, I would like it to have a good amount of power also, just because I drive a large car does not mean it should skip on the performance...frankly I dont care about gas prices, and I am willing to pay them, and until all the gasoline runs out I will still want my big gas-guzzling V8...there is no replacement for displacement...while going lighter is another idea, there is only so light you can go until the car starts becoming unsafe...you could make cars lighter, but take for example a corvette...it weighs in the 3000 lb range...not exactly the lightest in the car worold, but what it lacks in lightness, it makes up for in overall performance...now take the same corvette and drop 1000 lbs from it...the performance skyrockets, yet if you were ever to get into an accident, there is no questioning that the car would most likely be totaled, and you would probably be dead...unless they happen to come up with a new type of material that is light as a feather but stronger than steel or aluminum or whatever...until that happens, I will feel much safer driving a 3000 lb corvette made of steel and aluminum, than a 1000 lb corvette made of barely anything...I dont know, I may be ignorant in saying that the lighter a car is, the more unsafe it is, but hey, if I was rear ended by an SUV, it better be in a car that has some substance...wo while weight reduction is great and everything, I think I will keep my big block...ofcourse if you are talking to a person who doesnt like to pay for gas then their comments may be different, but being that I dont mind paying gas prices, no matter how exhuberant they may be, I could care less how much my car weighs, just as long as it makes up for that extra weight in extra performance...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-16-2005, 03:40 AM
Tman2 Tman2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 51
Default Re: (Nick)

So, because of SUVs, you don't want to have that much of a weight differential between cars and SUVs. If SUV weights came down or held steady (unlikely), then you'd probably accept a reduction in curb weight (without safety compromises). I understand. The spectre of a 6000lb SUV slamming ploughing into a Smart car is a big deterrent when weighing fuel economy against safety. I just think it'd be a step forward if manufacturers focused on advanced chassis design/materials instead of just giving people what they think they want (more power). If mass production of carbon fibre passenger compartments coupled with traditional steel unibody resulted in safe, lightweight cars, then we wouldn't need 250+ hp in family sedans. As fun as a big V8 may be, you're really missing out on the tossable nature of a lightweight sportscar. Besides, how much power do you think would satisfy you? 300? 400? 500hp? Is this a safe amount to be having teenagers learning how to drive on the family car?
A number of car companies (I think Audi, for one) have started taking the position that enough is enough and that they would not compete with BMW or Mercedes in the hp war. Toyota stated it even earlier, only to yield to customer criticism.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-16-2005, 04:24 AM
pcread pcread is offline
CSS Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,246
Default

Ah yes, the more weight is safer argument.
Consider this; if your car is lighter, it might handle better and you could avoid and evade crashes. Heavier cars take longer to stop. It's the law. Of physics.
Look at what the tiny Lotus Elise does with the little power it has at its disposal, on the Top Gear power lap it beat a Vanquish and was only .4s slower than a Ferrari 575 with more than 4x the horses. And yes, I know Lotus have since put a bigger engine into the car to produce the Exige, but Lotus, as an old F1 team know that weight is key. Colin Chapman lead the garagiste revolution in open seater racing in the late 50's and early 60's where heavy front engined cars were trashed on the track by light rear-engined ones. Lower top speed, but far better acceleration, cornering and braking.


Modified by pcread at 3:31 AM 1/16/2005
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-16-2005, 06:43 PM
Tman2 Tman2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 51
Default Re: (pcread)

I too would rather avoid an accident in the first place. I've managed to survive 37,000kms and 4 years of riding a 370lb motorcycle. And my Yamaha R6 would've been pulverized if I went head on into a Smart car!
Of course, with motorcycles, we have insane amounts of hp/weight ratios, which is why there a many motorcycle fatalities (a lot due to recklessness).
There is a limit to how much the average joe like you and me can handle (even if we think otherwise).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Black Falcon Media Group Oy