PDA

View Full Version : 2007 Chrysler Pacifica (Facelift)


Charger
03-20-2005, 06:38 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">These photos, taken just recently, capture a Chrysler Pacifica prototype undergoing cold-weather testing in northern Europe. When the car's driver spotted the photographer he sped away as fast as possible, indicating that there is something to hide on this prototype. What it is, exactly, is hard to know. Perhaps an all-new front end is hiding under the front disguise cover. And could those round lamps indicate an SRT version?</TD></TR></TABLE><br><A HREF="http://www.thecarconnection.com/images/gallery/9353_image.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://www.thecarconnection.co...e.jpg</A><br>It's not a for sure SRT but who knows, maybe it's just a facelift

Ascariss
03-20-2005, 07:05 PM
I would say facelift, because in my opinion, a SRT version is pointless.

Andre
03-20-2005, 08:19 PM
It's a facelift.<p>The intro for this is about a y ear off, then it would go on sale fall 2006 as an 07... Considering I believe it launched as a 2004 model in late 03 that would put it on the market for 3 years before this new model would go out... the standard timeframe for the first styling makeover.<p>Not to mention the headlights are different

Charger
03-20-2005, 08:25 PM
Insiders have been saying that the wheels are larger and that means it has bigger breaks meaning it has a more powerful engine. They were saying a 4 Liter, 300+ hp

Andre
03-20-2005, 10:51 PM
Either way, I can tell you right now that that car will not wear an SRT badge

mzoltarp
03-21-2005, 06:18 AM
Yeah I know Chrysler says the Pacifica is not a minivan, but in essence it is. Does anyone really want an SRT minivan? I think not. One has to wonder if they plan a power upgrade given that the Pacifica is so gentle in its acceleration.

knicks125
03-21-2005, 06:29 AM
agreed...they can deny all they want, but the bottom line, pacifica is a minivan, maybe a sportier looking minivan...it's a good thing they are not going to put the srt on the pacifica...if they do, that would be they are taking the shady route like chevy putting ss on pratically every car <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emthdown.gif" BORDER="0"> <BR><BR>
<i>Modified by knicks125 at 9:00 AM 3/21/2005</i>

Charger
03-21-2005, 06:59 AM
Ok, it's not an SRT. Insiders are just saying it is a mule for a more powerful non-SRT engine.

DaDesign
03-21-2005, 07:35 AM
I saw that car on friday here in windsor, from what I can tell its a faceleft of some sort, I noticed that the tailights no longer had the orange part other then that I did not see much.

The Spy
03-21-2005, 11:24 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>mzoltarp</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yeah I know Chrysler says the Pacifica is not a minivan, but in essence it is. Does anyone really want an SRT minivan? I think not. One has to wonder if they plan a power upgrade given that the Pacifica is so gentle in its acceleration.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>I guess, I would compare the Pacifica with Mercedes' R-Class (although the R-Class will be slightly bigger). The concept is a bit different, the R-Class will have AWD (does the Pacifica have AWD? I'm not sure...) and it is a bit more expensive, but basically it's the same.<br>And there will be an R63 AMG, so maybe there would be a market for a Pacifica SRT-8, too?

Charger
03-21-2005, 11:27 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>The Spy</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I guess, I would compare the Pacifica with Mercedes' R-Class (although the R-Class will be slightly bigger). The concept is a bit different, the R-Class will have AWD (does the Pacifica have AWD? I'm not sure...) and it is a bit more expensive, but basically it's the same.<br>And there will be an R63 AMG, so maybe there would be a market for a Pacifica SRT-8, too?</TD></TR></TABLE><br>Yes, the Pacifica has AWD. <B>IF</B> Chrysler ever produces a Pacifica SRT it would most likely be an SRT-6 because Chrysler doesnt even offer a V8 for any other Pacifica model.

AM2
03-21-2005, 02:18 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Charger</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><br>Yes, the Pacifica has AWD. <B>IF</B> Chrysler ever produces a Pacifica SRT it would most likely be an SRT-6 because Chrysler doesnt even offer a V8 for any other Pacifica model.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>I think the reason the Pacifica can't have a V8 is Chrysler doesn't have a V8 that was designed to be mounted transversely...

Roadster44
03-21-2005, 04:20 PM
Eh I wouldn't mind seeing an SRT version of Pacifica. I think its a worthy idea. <p>As for pics, yeah facelift.

erzhik
03-21-2005, 04:51 PM
looks the same to me

GerjurdKing
03-21-2005, 07:06 PM
What they should do is incoporate the headlights from the concept. I suppose an SRT-6 version would be nice. How about the engine from the Crossfire?

Roadster44
03-21-2005, 11:29 PM
Quahog, RI?!!! That's where Peter Griffin and his family are from! You know Family Guy.

GerjurdKing
03-22-2005, 07:09 AM
I certainly do...

skoochythatone
03-22-2005, 07:35 AM
The MB R-Class and the Chrysler Pacifica are not related. The R-Class is a total different concept, combining both luxurious sedan abilities with the room of a bigger, sportier family vehicle while still being a lot different than most cars.

The Spy
03-23-2005, 07:02 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>skoochythatone</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">...The R-Class is a total different concept, combining both luxurious sedan abilities with the room of a bigger, sportier family vehicle while still being a lot different than most cars...</TD></TR></TABLE><p>Chrysler said the same about the Pacifica, when it came out. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emwink.gif" BORDER="0"> <br>Don't get me wrong: I don't say that they're nearly the same. But I say that they're not too different besides the fact that the R-Class will be a lot bigger, a lot more expensive and will have much more powerful engines.

skoochythatone
03-23-2005, 07:31 AM
Then the MB marketing strategy made a very different effect on both of us. I see the Chyrsler Pacifica clearly as a minivan, while I see the upcoming R-Class clearly as totally new vehicle concept. But I might be prejudiced by some things affecting my every day life to be so behind MB... ;-)

The Spy
03-23-2005, 09:37 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>skoochythatone</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">But I might be prejudiced by some things affecting my every day life to be so behind MB... ;-)</TD></TR></TABLE><p>I thought so... <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/biggrin.gif" BORDER="0"> <br>But I guess in some parts you're right because I think the R-Class' concept points in the same direction like the Pacificas but it (the R-Class' concept) is more consequent (right now my english sounds horrible, but I hope, you know what I mean <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emwink.gif" BORDER="0"> ).<p>But another point to the picture this thread was started with: I also think it's only a facelift and not a facelift AND SRT-Whatever, because the photographer must have heard the engine of the car. And if it sounded SRT-like, I think the author would have written it in the text.

Nodnarb
12-01-2005, 02:53 PM
<A HREF="http://media.popularmechanics.com/images/PMX1205newcars034_large.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://media.popularmechanics....e.jpg</A>

SHEPO
12-01-2005, 07:00 PM
new lights and possibly a revised grille...subtle changes, but it looks nice <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emthup.gif" BORDER="0">

Cozz
12-01-2005, 11:19 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Nodnarb</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><A HREF="http://media.popularmechanics.com/images/PMX1205newcars034_large.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://media.popularmechanics....e.jpg</A> </TD></TR></TABLE><p>Yup, I could see the differences between those headlights and my Pacifica.

Banker
12-27-2005, 08:36 AM
Any word on an upgraded engine for the Pacifica? Honestly - that is about all this vehicle needs. It has the nicest interior of any Chrysler - it just needs more power.

Banker
05-25-2006, 08:50 AM
Here is a clear picture of the new 2007 Pacifica which features an updated front end and new engine and transmission. The Pacifica has been a good seller for Chrysler (after an admitted slow initial sales start). The new front end and hood are a great improvement. The new engine and transmssion sound excellent as the power train was one of the vehicles few weaknesses in that it didn't have enough motivation for its hefty curb weight.<p>This is a significant vehicle as it will be one of the direct competitors to the Buick Enclave. The Pacifica is an established brand for Chrysler. The Enclave will be slightly larger with a roomier third row and more cargo room behind the third row seat - but it remains to be seen how these will compare in price and in driving dynamics. <p>Here is the link:<br><A HREF="http://www.allpar.com/model/cs.html" TARGET="_blank">http://www.allpar.com/model/cs.html</A>

Cadavillac
05-25-2006, 07:23 PM
Nice update... but too bad the HID headlights are gone. :(

Chris_Doane
05-25-2006, 09:16 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Cadavillac</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nice update... but too bad the HID headlights are gone. :(</TD></TR></TABLE><p>They aren't gone, this protoype just didn't have that option.

Cadavillac
05-25-2006, 09:58 PM
You know, I didn't think of that. <p>I &lt;3 CD-BP. <p>:D

Chris_Doane
05-25-2006, 10:36 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Cadavillac</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You know, I didn't think of that. <p>I &lt;3 CD-BP. <p>:D</TD></TR></TABLE><p><IMG SRC="http://www.cheersandgears.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif" BORDER="0"> Well...glad I could help.

mzoltarp
05-26-2006, 05:59 AM
Far too tame of an update. If old and new have to be parked side by side to see the differences, there is no reason to do the restyling in the first place.

Banker
05-26-2006, 10:04 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>mzoltarp</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Far too tame of an update. If old and new have to be parked side by side to see the differences, there is no reason to do the restyling in the first place.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>It is a typical mid cycle refresh on the exterior. In fact - it is getting more work done than many vehicles do at mid life cycle. Look at the last Accord refresh - just new head and tail lamps - but no powertrain or interior upgrades. The Pacifica is getting a new engine, transmission, new front facia, hood and interior electronic upgrades including a new rear view camera. The mid cycle refresh is never intended to make the previous year model look completely outdated. The mid life cycle refresh it usually to address any short comings before the ground up redesign in a couple of years.<p>

62Lincoln
05-26-2006, 11:48 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Banker</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><p> Look at the last Accord refresh - just new head and tail lamps - but no powertrain or interior upgrades. <br></TD></TR></TABLE><br>I'm not a Honda apologist, but that's an inaccurate statement. Honda changed the entire rear end of the Accord to get rid of the Buick-looking taillight treatment, so the change included all the sheetmetal aft of the C pillar. That is much more than a typical midcycle refresh in terms of sheetmetal changes.

Banker
05-26-2006, 12:24 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>62Lincoln</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><br>I'm not a Honda apologist, but that's an inaccurate statement. Honda changed the entire rear end of the Accord to get rid of the Buick-looking taillight treatment, so the change included all the sheetmetal aft of the C pillar. That is much more than a typical midcycle refresh in terms of sheetmetal changes.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>You are correct. I guess my point was that their refresh was merely cosmetic while the Pacifica is getting significant powertrain upgrades with several new electronic upgrades as well. These types of upgrades are usually reserved for model changes every five years or so - not mid cycle refresh.

mzoltarp
05-26-2006, 01:07 PM
The point is that American automakers need to get back to using rapid restyles as a way to sell vehicles like they did in the 60's.

DaDesign
05-26-2006, 10:08 PM
pretty good and makes sence.

synthesis
05-27-2006, 12:37 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Banker</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You are correct. I guess my point was that their refresh was merely cosmetic while the Pacifica is getting significant powertrain upgrades with several new electronic upgrades as well. These types of upgrades are usually reserved for model changes every five years or so - not mid cycle refresh.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>Yeah I agree with what you originally said, and I think a good example of that would be the previous generation Camry. As far as I could tell (and I looked pretty hard) the only change at mid-life for that model was a very slight switch in the tail-light treatment. <p>The biggest weakness of the Pacifica design imo was the headlamps and minivan looking front end. And both were addressed. So I'm happy with it.

DaDesign
05-30-2006, 05:55 PM
hmm, I looked at the interior shot again... how come it still has the old cd player unit?

JBlair
05-30-2006, 06:55 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>DaDesign</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hmm, I looked at the interior shot again... how come it still has the old cd player unit?</TD></TR></TABLE><p>They may not have updated that part of the car yet. Because some powertrain changes are expected, a proto like this may only have sheetmetal changes and not interior changes. (because the grille may be different, they need to make sure the mechanicals run ok) If there were other protos that had the old unit, then I'd be inclined to say that they were going to keep it, but since this is the only one, we can't be sure yet.

Banker
05-30-2006, 06:58 PM
I would imagine that they will keep the dash layout as it is a very expensive component to engineer. The new head units do not fit the old slots so I suspect that we will see the this interior until the Pacifica is redone for the 2009 or 2010 model year.

JBlair
05-30-2006, 07:25 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Banker</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would imagine that they will keep the dash layout as it is a very expensive component to engineer. The new head units do not fit the old slots so I suspect that we will see the this interior until the Pacifica is redone for the 2009 or 2010 model year.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>Are you sure about that? Seeing as how nothing in this interior is changed, I wouldn't be suprised if chrysler surprised us with a significant interior update to bring it in line with the rest of the line-up. (like they did with the PT) I honestly do not see them leaving it as-is.

Chris_Doane
05-30-2006, 08:01 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>JBlair</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><p>Are you sure about that? Seeing as how nothing in this interior is changed, I wouldn't be suprised if chrysler surprised us with a significant interior update to bring it in line with the rest of the line-up. (like they did with the PT) I honestly do not see them leaving it as-is.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>Actually since this update only has to last a little over 2 years until the total redesign, it's possible the interior will just wait until then.

Cadavillac
05-30-2006, 09:41 PM
You're right, <B>mzoltarp</B> . American auto manufacturers need to bring back rapidly changing exteriors... Heck, it doesn't even have to be as drastic as it was pre-1976... Just change the trim, or a headlight surround...<I>something</I>. <p>I can correctly identify the year of any Cadillac from 1942-1976 at a quick glance because of exterior details. Ever try to do that with a 2001-2005 Impala or any Grand Prix from 1997.5 and up? It can't be done, especially if the car has aftermarket wheels.<p>Regarding the Pacifica update... it's really a great vehicle... all it needed was a little more juice, and perhaps the new corporate radio. Of course, the old one was a good unit and should do well if it has to soldier on until the full redesign.<p>BTW, the new 4.0 V6 kicks ass. I wish the 4.0 would replace the 3.5 in the 300 Touring/Limited. I also wish I could stay on topic. :o)

DSC-OFF
05-31-2006, 07:57 AM
<A HREF="http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com//media/il/features/future/07.chrysler.pacifica/07.chrysler.pacfica.f34.500.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332...0.jpg</A><p><A HREF="http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com//media/il/features/future/07.chrysler.pacifica/07.chrysler.pacifica.r500.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332...0.jpg</A><p><A HREF="http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com//media/il/features/future/07.chrysler.pacifica/07.chrysler.pacfica.fnt.500.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332...0.jpg</A><p><A HREF="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/GeneralFuture/articleId=115533#3" TARGET="_blank">EdmundsInsideLine</A><br> <br>

Monkey
05-31-2006, 08:09 AM
I agree with Cadavillac. Even a two year refresh would be nice to see.

Banker
05-31-2006, 11:18 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>DSC-OFF</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><A HREF="http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com//media/il/features/future/07.chrysler.pacifica/07.chrysler.pacfica.f34.500.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332...0.jpg</A><p><A HREF="http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com//media/il/features/future/07.chrysler.pacifica/07.chrysler.pacifica.r500.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332...0.jpg</A><p><A HREF="http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com//media/il/features/future/07.chrysler.pacifica/07.chrysler.pacfica.fnt.500.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332...0.jpg</A><p><A HREF="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/GeneralFuture/articleId=115533#3" TARGET="_blank">EdmundsInsideLine</A><br> <br> </TD></TR></TABLE><p>Thanks for posting the information. It seems that the Sebring, Pacifica and new Town & Country are getting a lot of press time these days. Chrysler is going to have a nice all new line this fall continuing through next spring. The all new Aspen and Sebring, updated Pacifica and 300 for 2007 and the all new Town & Country for 2008. This is looking to be a good year to be a Chrysler dealership. They should be able to move these vehicles pretty well. I can't wait to see them all!

StevenZoz
05-31-2006, 12:34 PM
based on the pictures, this is gonna be really bland looking on the base models with the grey cladding.

Banker
05-31-2006, 12:42 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>stevenzoz</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">based on the pictures, this is gonna be really bland looking on the base models with the grey cladding.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>The current base model is very bland. The grey cladding and the hub caps look very cheap in my opinion. I woudn't get the base model if I was in the market for a CUV anyway.<p>But Chrysler sells plenty of base model Pacifica's - so there must be a market for them.

StevenZoz
05-31-2006, 12:54 PM
well i know that but im just saying i think this will look even more bland than the current.

Cadavillac
06-01-2006, 06:27 AM
JBlair, if you look closely, there are some changes to the interior... on the door there's a wood inlay on the metallic strip above the arm rest, and also a gated shifter with a new fakewood/leather shift knob, rather than the old one slot shifter with a wider AutoStick transverse slot at the rear and molded plastic shift knob.<p>Though the differences are few, I believe this is the new Pacifica interior. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emthup.gif" BORDER="0">

JBlair
06-01-2006, 09:06 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Cadavillac</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">JBlair, if you look closely, there are some changes to the interior... on the door there's a wood inlay on the metallic strip above the arm rest, and also a gated shifter with a new fakewood/leather shift knob, rather than the old one slot shifter with a wider AutoStick transverse slot at the rear and molded plastic shift knob.<p>Though the differences are few, I believe this is the new Pacifica interior. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emthup.gif" BORDER="0"> </TD></TR></TABLE><p>The Gated shifter has been available on the pacifica for over a year. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/bangin.gif" BORDER="0"> <p>Edit: Just checked out Chrysler's website and, save for the metal inset trim on the upper door panel, the interior on the proto is almost identical to the current one. I hope it doesn't stay that way in production though......<BR><BR>
<i>Modified by JBlair at 11:30 PM 6/1/2006</i>

Cadavillac
06-01-2006, 09:43 PM
My GOD JBlair, where have I been? And I call myself a Pacifica fan! LOL *dies* <p>My apologies in full :) Don't you hate people who know it all? :D

JBlair
06-01-2006, 10:21 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Cadavillac</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My GOD JBlair, where have I been? And I call myself a Pacifica fan! LOL *dies* <p>My apologies in full :) Don't you hate people who know it all? :D</TD></TR></TABLE><p><br>LOL. Nah its okay. The change to the gated shifter was a TINY one, and the only reason I knew about it was because Andre showed me a picture of it when they changed it over. (he saw it in person) Most people wouldn't have noticed.

Fabia SDI Elegance
08-23-2006, 09:53 PM
Pics from yesterday at M50 - Pacifica 4.0 V8 AWD:<p><A HREF="http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slika167zd2.jpg" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/9633/slika167zd2.th.jpg" BORDER="0"></A><p><A HREF="http://img170.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slika168ev0.jpg" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/3116/slika168ev0.th.jpg" BORDER="0"></A><p><A HREF="http://img170.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slika169ls3.jpg" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/5291/slika169ls3.th.jpg" BORDER="0"></A><p><A HREF="http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slika170xg4.jpg" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4440/slika170xg4.th.jpg" BORDER="0"></A><p><br> <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/beerchug.gif" BORDER="0">

Cozz
08-24-2006, 04:40 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Fabia SDI Elegance</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Pics from yesterday at M50 - Pacifica 4.0 V8 AWD:<p><A HREF="http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slika167zd2.jpg" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/9633/slika167zd2.th.jpg" BORDER="0"></A><p><A HREF="http://img170.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slika168ev0.jpg" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/3116/slika168ev0.th.jpg" BORDER="0"></A><p><A HREF="http://img170.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slika169ls3.jpg" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/5291/slika169ls3.th.jpg" BORDER="0"></A><p><A HREF="http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slika170xg4.jpg" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4440/slika170xg4.th.jpg" BORDER="0"></A><p><br> <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/beerchug.gif" BORDER="0"> </TD></TR></TABLE><p>This thread is overwith since the facelift has been out months ago. Look for the thread in the new cars section and post your pics there.

Monkey
08-25-2006, 05:22 AM
But I think they were posted here because they are of a V8 Pacifica

knicks125
08-25-2006, 05:38 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Fabia SDI Elegance</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Pics from yesterday at M50 - Pacifica 4.0 V8 AWD:</TD></TR></TABLE><p><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Monkey</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">But I think they were posted here because they are of a V8 Pacifica</TD></TR></TABLE><p>Just for the record, there is no such a thing as a 4L V8<p>There is a 4L I6 (AMC/Jeep if I recall), and 4L V6 (Chrysler/Dodge)

Fabia SDI Elegance
08-25-2006, 08:09 PM
Oh, I see, it's a V8 with 255 hp and 6 speed a/t.

knicks125
08-25-2006, 08:31 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Fabia SDI Elegance</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Oh, I see, it's a V8 with 255 hp and 6 speed a/t.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>Pacifica doesn't have a V8, unless that is for the next gen (which would still be a few years away). Personally, I have not heard anything about a V8 in the Pacifica so I am not sure where you are getting these information. I'd appreciate if you could double check them.<p>By the way, the 255hp you referred to is a V6; 4.0L V6 I referred to in the previous post - SOHC

Cozz
08-26-2006, 05:24 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Fabia SDI Elegance</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Oh, I see, it's a V8 with 255 hp and 6 speed a/t.</TD></TR></TABLE><p>It's a V6 4.0.<p>This will be the engine/tranny upgrade from the 3.5 V6,4spd auto.

Swallow Doretti
08-28-2006, 09:22 AM
These new pics are of an SRT version of the Pacifica, apparently. Check the dual tail pipes--those are different than the production version (even with the facelift).<p>

Chris_Doane
08-28-2006, 11:41 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>bgluckman</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">These new pics are of an SRT version of the Pacifica, apparently. Check the dual tail pipes--those are different than the production version (even with the facelift).</TD></TR></TABLE><p>There is no SRT version of the Pacifica. The model with the 4.0L V6 has twin pipes. That is the car pictured.

Swallow Doretti
08-28-2006, 12:15 PM
Well, maybe it's just the angle, but those do look like freer-flowing exhausts to me with larger mufflers. It could also be just me.<p><IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/bonk.gif" BORDER="0"><p>Although, PhaetonChix over at TCL reports seeing a camo'ed and lowered Pacifica running around:<p><A HREF="http://forums.thecarlounge.net/zerothread?id=2792024&uid=184138&postid=31661274#31661274" TARGET="_blank">http://forums.thecarlounge.net...61274</A><p>*shrug*<p>I don't follow DCX's new products that closely, so I honestly don't know.

Chris_Doane
08-28-2006, 03:52 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>bgluckman</b> &raquo;</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I don't follow DCX's new products that closely, so I honestly don't know. </TD></TR></TABLE><p>I do. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/biggrin.gif" BORDER="0">

StevenZoz
08-28-2006, 04:35 PM
<A HREF="http://www.carspyshots.net/zerothread?id=20072" TARGET="_blank">http://www.carspyshots.net/zerothread?id=20072</A><p>shouldnt this be continued in the new cars section?

knicks125
08-28-2006, 04:45 PM
Yes but this is fine.<p>The latest discussions here sprung from spy shots taken by one of our members <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emthup.gif" BORDER="0">

Fabia SDI Elegance
08-29-2006, 02:26 PM
Sorry guys, It was my bad, there is no V8. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/nixweiss.gif" BORDER="0"> <br>4.0 is V6. <p><br>Sorry again. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/bow.gif" BORDER="0">